Friday, October 2, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GREAT, CURRENT GMAT QUANT PROBLEMS. E-MAIL US AND WE WILL SEND YOU A PDF FILE WITH ALL PROBLEMS POSTED. GMAT and GMAC are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council which neither sponsors nor endorses this blog.
(2) 4 > w > z > 0, so z < 4, sufficient. We are left with B and D
ReplyDelete(1) 1/w < 1/x < 1/y < 1/z (from the question stem)
1/w + 1/x + 1/y + 1/z < 4/z
1 < 4/z
z < 4
So, (D) is the answer
Yep, answer is D. Statement 2 is the easy one, cross multiply ant that's it.
ReplyDeleteThe other way of looking at 1 is to see that if all your guys are equal to, say, 4 each, then they add up to one, but we are told that z is less than all the other guys, so the other fractions will be less than 1/z, so to allow the other fractions to be more than 1/4, z must be less than 4.
I keep getting B as the correct answer.
ReplyDelete1/w > 1/4, so w < 4.
from original we know w > z > 0, so 3.999 > z > 0, thus Z must be less than 4. What am I missing? Thanks! -Mike
Mike,
ReplyDeletePer question:
w > x > y > z , take the reciprocal(reverse inequality )
1/w < 1/x < 1/y < 1/z
Add all:
1/w + 1/x + 1/y + 1/z now since 1/z is the largest of the 4 terms the sum has to be less than 4/z
or 1/w + 1/x + 1/y + 1/z < 4/z
But Lft side =1 per 1
1 < 4/z
z < 4
2: is straight forward, just cross multiply
w < 4 and z < w , hence z < 4.
D